Itchmo Forums for Cats & Dogs Brought to you by Itchmo: Essential news, humor and info for cats, dogs and pet owners.
November 19, 2008, 05:23:10 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Go To Itchmo.com: Read the latest cat, dog and pet news, pet food recall info, product reviews and more — updated daily.


Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Mycobiota and aflatoxins in raw materials and pet food in Brazil  (Read 581 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Offly_irked
Guest
« on: May 29, 2008, 04:32:55 AM »

I had been doing some research on vomitoxin (DON) & PH.. and came across this recent research testing pet foods and aflatoxins:

http://www.ingentaconnect.com/search/article;jsessionid=2cckex1deccfn.alice?title=Fusarium+toxins&title_type=tka&year_from=1998&year_to=2008&database=1&pageSize=20&index=1

Quote
Authors: Campos, S. G.1; Cavaglieri, L. R.; Fernández Juri, M. G.; Dalcero, A. M.; Krüger, C.1; Keller, L. A. M.1; Magnoli, C.E.; Rosa, C. A. R.1
Source: Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, Volume 92, Number 3, June 2008 , pp. 377-383(7)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Abstract:

Summary

Commercial feedstuffs are a basic element in modern pet husbandry in the world. In dogs, the effect of mycotoxins is severe and can lead to death. Few reports on the influence of dietary mycotoxins were found in the scientific literature. The aims of this work were to isolate and identify the mycoflora and to determine the aflatoxins (AFs) natural occurrence in raw materials and ready dry pet food. Therefore, the aflatoxigenic capacity of Aspergillus flavus species was investigated. Aspergillus was the prevalent genera (65-89%) followed by Penicillium and Fusarium spp. Aspergillus flavus was the most prevalent species, followed by Aspergillus sydowii, Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus versicolor. Aspergillus flavus frequencies ranged from 58% to 86% except in sorghum meal. All samples assayed (except corn grains and ready pet food) showed Fusarium spp. contamination. Corn meal and corn meal and gluten samples had 100%Fusarium verticillioides. Fusarium graminearum was isolated from sorghum meal. Aspergillus flavus strains (75%) isolated from raw materials and 57% from pet food were able to produce AFs. All samples showed AFs contamination percentages over 70%; corn and sorghum meal obtained the highest AFs levels. Ready pet food did not show quantitative levels of the tested toxins. This is the first report of the aflatoxigenic capacity by A. flavus from Brazilian pet food.

Keywords: Aspergillus flavus; pet food; aflatoxins

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2008.00809.x

Affiliations: 1: ?Departamento de Microbiologia e Imunología Veterinária, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Veterinária, Rio de Janeiro,??Brazil


It's maybe too early, but I'm having a hard time reconciling some of the statements.. input anybody? Maybe I need to write them to get clarification for this layperson who is having multiple senior moments Smiley

"All samples assayed (except corn grains and ready pet food) showed Fusarium spp. contamination.'

"Aspergillus flavus strains ... 57% from pet food were able to produce AFs."

"All samples showed AFs contamination percentages over 70%; corn and sorghum meal obtained the highest AFs levels. "

"Ready pet food did not show quantitative levels of the tested toxins."


Maybe I just need to get the full report.. this is an abstract....and maybe there are gaps in the assays done & the results.
-----

Oh.. here are the links searching for results with "pet food" :

http://www.ingentaconnect.com/search?form_name=sidebar&title=pet+food&database=1

http://www.ingentaconnect.com/search?form_name=sidebar&title=%22pet+food%22&database=1
« Last Edit: May 29, 2008, 04:45:38 AM by Offly_irked » Logged
petslave
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2703


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2008, 07:54:49 PM »

Okay, now I get it.  The pet food DID test postitive for the Aspergillus species, but not the aflotoxin that they can produce.  They were however, able to get 57% of the Aspergillus that were isolated from the pet food to produce the aflatoxin, so the potential is there if conditions are right.  (whew, that really tested my brain!) 

These are not good results.  I wonder if Wenewe tests its ingredients for mycotoxins?


Google Scholar is a fun tool to use if you're just looking for scientific papers & want to weed out all the "aflatoxin sold on ebay, buy your aflatoxin here" messages:

http://scholar.google.com/advanced_scholar_search?hl=en&lr=
Logged
petslave
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2703


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2008, 08:13:44 PM »

Conditions that cause A. flavus to produce aflatoxin:

http://www.aspergillusflavus.org/aflavus/index.html

looks like irradiation & use of aggressively competative non-aflotoxin strains are being tested to lower contamination.  Not sure I like any of these solutions.
Logged
martin
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 34



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2008, 07:57:29 PM »

Mycoflora in Commercial Pet Foods

This article reports on the identification of mycoflora of 21 dry pet foods (12 belonging to dogs and 9 to cats) that corresponded to 8 commercial brands made in Argentina and imported. The isolation frequency and relative density of the prevalent fungal genera are compared too. Ten genera and fungi classified as Mycelia sterilia were identified. The predominant genera were Aspergillus (62%), Rhizopus (48%), and Mucor (38%). The most prevalent among Aspergillus was Aspergillus flavus followed by Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus terreus. The predominant Mucor was Mucor racemosus followed by Mucor plumbeus and Mucor globosus. The moisture content of these foods ranged from 5.6 to 10.0% and from 7.2 to 9.9% for dog and cat foods, respectively. A greater moisture content in food for the senior category (9.5 ± 0.2) was observed only in comparison to adult and kitten/puppy. If the moisture content can be maintained at these levels, mold growth would be prevented or at least it would remain at an insignificant level. Some genera and species isolated and identified from the foods analyzed are potentially producing toxins, which are known as mycotoxins. This involves a risk for animal health.
Logged
martin
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 34



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2008, 07:59:22 PM »

Here's the link.

http://www.ingentaconnect.com/search/article?title=pet+food+toxins&title_type=tka&year_from=1998&year_to=2008&database=1&pageSize=20&index=2
Logged
Nabiya
Guest
« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2008, 08:00:44 PM »

offy, quite a find and relative comparison.  Now, regarding all the contaminants found and how they got into the feed supply.  Outside of pesticides which I would assume are being sprayed on, how do the rest of the contaminants enter the feed supply?  I'm thinking it has to be through the water supply.  Even though this study is presented from a while ago, put on top of these results the substitution of ingredients in the nutrients with other contaminants, it's just pure poison.
Logged
kaffe
Guest
« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2008, 08:05:38 PM »

I need to read this slowly   Angry
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Copyright 2007 Itchmo.com: Read the latest cat, dog and pet news, pet food recall info, product reviews and more — updated daily.
Powered by SMF 1.1.3 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
| Sitemap