Itchmo Forums for Cats & Dogs Brought to you by Itchmo: Essential news, humor and info for cats, dogs and pet owners.
July 05, 2020, 09:49:44 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Go To Read the latest cat, dog and pet news, pet food recall info, product reviews and more — updated daily.

Pages: [1]
Author Topic: "Meat first" pet foods  (Read 2299 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« on: March 16, 2012, 06:06:06 AM »

I'd love to get your opinions of this article:
Hero Member
Posts: 4767

« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2012, 07:03:47 AM »

For the average pet owner?  confusing.  Meat-first diet isn't as good as....what, a vegetable first diet?  a processed food  first diet?  Which foods are the worst, which are the best?  The science may be good, but it's written in a manner that turns the average reader away and it offers no real option at the end.  They lost me after the second paragraph and the end was no help.
Hero Member
Posts: 3330

« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2012, 09:07:39 AM »

I immediately wondered if there is a connection to any pet food manufacturers so I pulled up the Novus website, the author of the article is a manager and researcher there.  

The company history says that Novus was originally a division of Monsanto.  It was sold and is now owned by Mitsui & Co. and Nippon Soda Co.  Undecided   They supply nutrition products, such as methionine, antioxidants, omega-3 fatty acids, enzymes, trace minerals, etc, to the pet food manufacturers and supply chain ingredient suppliers.

I'm confused, too.  Is the article suggesting that high percentages of meat is not necessary in food that contains their nutritional additives and supplements?  

eta: website links

« Last Edit: March 16, 2012, 09:11:29 AM by Fizzy1 » Logged

I once asked a four year old what the secret of life was.  "Feed the kitties," she said, "Feed the kitties."--Ellis Felker
Hero Member
Posts: 11145

Trooper,Remy & Fragile

« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2012, 04:12:44 PM »

Before I read the article I thought it might be a discussion of meat vs meat meal in dry food. But it just sounds like the usual spin to make iffy pet food ingredients sound better. I know everyone can't raw or homecook feed, but any amount of real food you can add to a commercial diet will help. Dogs & cats natural diets didn't need supplementation, chelated or not.

"the world's most inept extortionist"
Hero Member
Posts: 5617

« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2012, 06:28:21 PM »

It seems that this article to primarily directed to pet food manufacturers in an effort to encourage them to use this company's supplements, which, I suppose, are chelated to avoid the issues that are discussed in the article.   Huh
Hero Member
Posts: 4905

RIP little angel Katey

« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2012, 07:14:23 PM »

What I don't like about the article, is that it doesn't give any clues as to what their saying the diet should consist of. In fact, you could formulate a home-made diet to be lower in Ca and P and those minerals in question. You would have to choose the right meats and feed them in the right "format" (cooked or raw) to get the levels you wanted. And really, do you think the selenium and iron is naturally occurring in any of these pet foods? They're making it sound like all of the elements in question are there because of the meat in the diets, when they are actually adding more of these elements into the food. So, if there is such concern, cut back on that. Reformulate. It isn't rocket science.

My little babies, you'll always be in my heart. Mom will see you later. Look after each other, ok?
Pages: [1]
Jump to:  

Copyright 2007 Read the latest cat, dog and pet news, pet food recall info, product reviews and more — updated daily.
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines | Sitemap