|
5CatMom
|
 |
« Reply #720 on: September 26, 2008, 04:45:51 AM » |
|
JJ, Here's a website where you can follow the news, and if you have cable TV, there's good coverage on the financial news channels. I've given up on local news as it's too influenced by politics of the news organization. http://www.cnbc.com/What's going on in Washington sounds like they're trying to build a raft while being swept down the rapids. There seems to be a sincere desire by both parties to solve the problem, but strong disagreement on the approach. Should it be a "bailout" or a loan? Clearly, there are pros/cons to both points of view depending on whether you favor a short term or long term fix. And don't forget that one option is to do nothing and let the markets work things out. While I was following the news yesterday, CNBC reported that China told their banks to not lend to US banks. Apparently, this was a rumor and the story was quickly withdrawn, but if this were to happen, there would be dire consequences. Whatever the "solution", IMHO, this debacle will eventually have far reaching and widespread effects. 5CatMom =^..^ =
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 26, 2008, 05:26:43 AM by 5CatMom »
|
Logged
|
"What is man without the beasts? If the beasts were gone, men would die from a great loneliness of spirit. For whatever happens to the beasts, soon happens to man. All things are connected." Chief Seattle
"We are the caretakers of our creatures . . . the peacekeepers of our planet"
|
|
|
|
JJ
|
 |
« Reply #721 on: September 26, 2008, 09:20:53 PM » |
|
5cat thx for the link. Gave up cable this Jan. will be 5 yrs. ago. Too expensive for basic tv at almost $50.00 a month with no premium channels. My info is from the few places I go to on the net as they have a lot of boths sides of the equation and not just leaning towards one side or the other.
The one financial analyst said that the firms need to put up the money for this whole shebang and not one cent should be heaped on the taxpayers back as he said they made this mess and should straighter it out themselves. On rense.com read today that they (the fraudsters/rip-off artists, ponzi schemers) were not expecting the american peoples response to a big giant NO BAILOUT. They probably thought we weren't paying attention again-how wrong they were. Thousands and thousands are emailing, faxing, calling and telling those they speak with JUST SAY NO, No Bailout, Nada.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'Life isn't about how to survive the storm, But how to dance in the rain.'
|
|
|
|
Poco
|
 |
« Reply #722 on: September 26, 2008, 10:05:27 PM » |
|
So many people are so beaten down financially that they feel they have nothing to lose if the system freezes. They don't have stocks, bonds, or money in a bank. Or if they did, they secured those assets some time ago. And if they have a mortgage, they are prime borrowers and they can pay their bills. As far as being spooked about job loss - during the Great Depression peak unemployment was estimated to be about 25%. 75% were still working. Some parts of the country flourished. Real unemployment figures are already much higher than those given by the propaganda arm of the government. (6%) http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_dataBLS pegs it at about 10.5% and the economist at Shadow Stats estimates it to be about 14.5%. So we are talking about a possible 10% increase in unemployment. If we let people be accountable for their actions, we could save that 700 billion and use it for emergency aid and infrastructure rebuilding programs to create jobs for people here in America, should we need it. There is no guarantee that the 700 billion will stave off a Depression. We will be even more in the hole if we spend that money now and the plan does not work. I heard a suggestion today about letting bankruptcy judges order refi's for deserving mortgage holders. I think we should force mortgage holders to do that, even if they have to write 50 year mortgages. That holds the mortgage companies that did the risk assessment on those loans or that bought the loans in the secondary market responsible for their actions along with the people that took out those loans. That could help us hit a bottom on the real estate market. I think this BIS economist makes sense. http://www.bis.org/speeches/sp080708.htm International governance for the prevention and management of financial crises Dinner speech by Mr William R White, Economic Adviser and Head of Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements, at the Bank of France International Monetary Seminar on 'Liquidity Crisis, Capital Crisis?', Paris, 10 June 2008.
....Valuing complex structures has received a lot of attention recently, but the problems run far deeper than that.
.........These assumptions will also be crucially dependent on what happens to important macroeconomic variables affecting corporate and household bankruptcies. For a current example, the viability of many banks, not just in the United States but worldwide, now depends on when and at what level house prices stabilise in the United States. Also relevant is the question of how many homeowners will put their house keys in the mail (jingle mail) in the interval, or declare bankruptcy themselves.
In recent years, new financial developments have made the problem of achieving an effective debt reduction even more complicated. In contrast to earlier sovereign debt crises (like Mexico in 1994 and, to a lesser degree, Asia in 1997), there are now millions of troubled borrowers (in particular US households) and a myriad of lenders. Moreover, given the growth of credit risk transfer instruments, the interests of investors are no longer aligned in preferring "half a loaf" to "no loaf" and seeking to avoid bankruptcies. On the contrary, those who hold debts against which they have taken out default insurance actually gain in the event of default. In sum, orderly private sector workouts are going to be even more difficult going forward. .............. 6. Conclusions Our current circumstances are what they are, and we must manage and resolve the current crisis as best we can. I leave it to others in other fora to suggest how best to do this.
............... We will be throwing good tens and hundreds of billions after bad if we don't hit that bottom in the real estate market. I was willing to go along with the Bear Stearns bailout and AIG nationalization....but now I have lost confidence in all of this. I feel like a bunch of carpetbaggers are coming out West and picking up assets on the cheap and dumping the toxic slop on the taxpayers. WaMu was not just 'sold.' The bank that 'bought' them took the crown jewels, the retail banking structure, but the government took over most of the debts! They are not being forthright about all this to the public.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 21, 2008, 09:31:27 PM by Poco »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JJ
|
 |
« Reply #724 on: September 29, 2008, 07:59:43 PM » |
|
Poco, wow had no idea Lincoln said that - that should be printed across the front page of every newspaper, on a billboard on every highway in every state, printed in magazines, run as the bottom scroll on news channels on cable, tv, etc. So true, how very true - they got in a spot and tried to come up with another way to fleece the people and the people said NO THANKS!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'Life isn't about how to survive the storm, But how to dance in the rain.'
|
|
|
|
Poco
|
 |
« Reply #725 on: September 29, 2008, 10:54:53 PM » |
|
You might like Ellen Brown's web site, JJ. http://www.webofdebt.com/Lincoln was a young man in 1837 but already the head of the Whig Party in Illinois. He must have been referencing the Panic of 1837. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1837http://www.librarycompany.org/Economics/2007Conference/sklansky.pdfThe Melodrama of Panic: William Leggett and the Literary Logic of Jacksonian Political Economy Jeffrey Sklansky Department of History, Oregon State University October 2007"Three days after the New York banks suspended redemption of their notes in May 1837, the intellectual leader of the city’s militant workingmen’s movement welcomed the long-awaited crash. “Let the banks perish! Let the monopolists be swept from the board!” declared William Leggett in his new weekly newspaper, The Plaindealer. “Let the whole brood of privileged money-changers give place to the hardy offsprings of commercial freedom, who ask for no protection but equal laws, and no exemption from the shocks of boundless competition.” Three months later, as tens of thousands of New Yorkers were thrown out of work and banks failed across the country, Leggett exulted that the collapse had finally exposed Wall Street and Pearl Street for what they were: “[T]hese bankers now stand before the world, by their own confession, as a crew of swindling pirates, who have been preying on the property of the community. They threw open their vaults, where they led the publick to believe that they had abundant resources of hidden treasure, and lo, not an ounce of silver or gold is there! . . . [T]heir promises now, instead of representing silver and gold, represent nothing but violated faith, andthe folly of publick credulity in the honesty of soulless corporations which derive their very being from legislative corruption.”1 Neither The Plaindealer nor the workingmen’s movement survived the panic of 1837, and Leggett himself died two years later at age 38, as broken as the banks. But his zealous opposition to the power of financiers and to the volatile system of paper currency and credit over which they presided gained a wide following amid the panic and the depression soon to follow.2 His advocacy of general incorporation laws and the “separation of Bank and State” became [edited]ic orthodoxy, and the editorial persona of “the plaindealer” inaugurated a mode of plebeian polemic taken up by New Yorkers such as Mike Walsh, George Lippard, and especially Walt Whitman, who looked to Leggett as a mentor.3....."
Around and around we go... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHu8LAWSKxU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBjqtAjSYzY Suzanne Vega - Cracking "It's a one time thing It just happens A lot Walk with me And we will see What we have got Ah...
My footsteps are ticking Like water dripping from a tree Walking a harline And stepping very carefully Ah...
My heart is broken It is worn out at the knees Hearing muffled Seeing blind Soon it will hit the deep freeze
And something is cracking..."
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poco
|
 |
« Reply #726 on: October 02, 2008, 01:28:15 AM » |
|
http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/its_the_derivatives.phpIT’S THE DERIVATIVES, STUPID! WHY FANNIE, FREDDIE AND AIG ALL HAD TO BE BAILED OUT Ellen Brown, September 18, 2008“I can calculate the movement of the stars, but not the madness of men.” – Sir Isaac Newton, after losing a fortune in the South Sea bubble"“The point everyone misses,” wrote economist Robert Chapman a decade ago, “is that buying derivatives is not investing. It is gambling, insurance and high stakes bookmaking. Derivatives create nothing.”1 They not only create nothing, but they serve to enrich non-producers at the expense of the people who do create real goods and services. In congressional hearings in the early 1990s, derivatives trading was challenged as being an illegal form of gambling. But the practice was legitimized by Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, who not only lent legal and regulatory support to the trade but actively promoted derivatives as a way to improve “risk management.” Partly, this was to boost the flagging profits of the banks; and at the larger banks and dealers, it worked. But the cost was an increase in risk to the financial system as a whole.2
Since then, derivative trades have grown exponentially, until now they are larger than the entire global economy. The Bank for International Settlements recently reported that total derivatives trades exceeded one quadrillion dollars – that’s 1,000 trillion dollars.3 How is that figure even possible? The gross domestic product of all the countries in the world is only about 60 trillion dollars. The answer is that gamblers can bet as much as they want. They can bet money they don’t have, and that is where the huge increase in risk comes in.
Credit default swaps (CDS) are the most widely traded form of credit derivative. CDS are bets between two parties on whether or not a company will default on its bonds."..... If you search Youtube for a live performance of Janis Joplin's Mercedes Benz song, you won't find it because she recorded the song for the first time on October 1st, 1970 - and she died of a heroin overdose on October 4, 1970. Perhaps her piercing insight cast a light upon the nature of greed that was just too bright to bear. Some things are better looked at through a glass, darkly.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 02, 2008, 01:31:34 AM by Poco »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JJ
|
 |
« Reply #727 on: October 03, 2008, 12:17:01 AM » |
|
Poco thats why there should not be a bailout of these crooks how cooked the books and now the deratives are just numbers in a computer with nothing to back any of it up. If they have margin calls where will these people come up with the cash to pay the margin call? With so many going to go belly up no one will step up to buy this load of toxic junk because they will all be in the same boat watching it sink with them all aboard IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'Life isn't about how to survive the storm, But how to dance in the rain.'
|
|
|
|
JJ
|
 |
« Reply #728 on: October 06, 2008, 08:17:56 PM » |
|
Sardonic a title may be, true. On the other hand we have all be royally screwed. Wait until this rip-off plan IMO folds out and watch what happens-no help for anyone except people who created this ponzi fiasco in the first place. From what I read on a couple of sites this bailout is supposed to make credit become more freed up so people can borrow to buy cars and houses. But with the unemployment being at a real figure of 11% (rumormillnews.com in their Reading Room today) who out there is credit worthy with all the foreclosures going on, companies downsizing or just closing up and people losing jobs-not many left who are credit worthy. Those who are probably already own a home and car so not going to take on any more debt as they watch whats going on nor in any rush to go out and buy another car to replace the one they have and take on another car payment. Financial companies going bust, banks out of money to stay in business, more and more losing jobs, food heading for the stratosphere, utilities trying to get their share of the turnips money that they do not have by trying to jack their rates higher and higher, cost of schooling heading for the stratosphere too, fees on everything they can think of to stick one on, gasoline still way too high.
Nah there are too many out there all expecting to keep taking money out of the pockets of the least among who can afford it and are barely hanging on now. Maybe when the credit cards are defaulted on big time along with the car loans something correct will be done. Until then its business as usual for the rich, of the rich and by the rich IMO. Not trickle down to any of us, don't wait, not going to happen anytime soon.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'Life isn't about how to survive the storm, But how to dance in the rain.'
|
|
|
|
Poco
|
 |
« Reply #729 on: October 07, 2008, 12:04:08 AM » |
|
I think I read the credit card system will be the next big disaster, but I can't find the link. I'm very irritated, too, JJ. A big bank broker confided to me back in the fall of 2006 that he thought it would be unethical to encourage people to buy into mutual funds since the market was unstable and overvalued. But then I watched the Fed blow that bubble bigger and bigger for another year by dropping interest rates, as inflation made food, fuel and healthcare increasingly unaffordable for the middle class. The administration thought they could hold it all together until the election. But they couldn't and it will be a much bigger systemic mess now than it would have been if it had started unwinding in 2006. Dow - Oct. 2006: 11,679 / Oct. 2007: 14, 164 / Oct. 2008: 9,955 http://preview.tinyurl.com/5lesweSo if people are feeling like they are taking losses on paper in their retirement accounts off of the spike after Oct. 2006, that was all funny money, anyway. People should have been moved then into conservative investments if they were near retirement. I know that people that got hit like that during the dot com bust were able to sue their brokerages, (if there was an advisory relationship), and win back their losses, so maybe some people can do that now. But it is the people losing jobs now because of the credit freeze and panic that really have something to complain about. That stinks. Same with all the people that can't afford necessities now matter how frugal they are. It's miserable and they are having their taxes diverted to pay for this mess.
This action by the WA state AG looks good, though. Nothing seems to be coming out of the taxpayer hide here and it could help some people. Don't know if enough will be helped to stabilize the market, though. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 06, 2008
At-risk Washington homeowners to get help in Countrywide settlement Attorney General McKenna says today’s settlement will offer mortgage relief to nearly 10,000 Washingtonians, helping them avoid foreclosure .
SEATTLE--Attorney General Rob McKenna Monday announced a landmark settlement brokered by Washington and other states requiring sub-prime lender Countrywide Financial Corp. to provide loan modifications for up to 395,000 borrowers nationwide. As a result, nearly 10,000 Washington homeowners will receive about $200 million in payment relief.
After months of negotiation, requiring several trips to Chicago, McKenna and attorneys general representing several states reached agreement with Bank of America late Friday. Bank of America acquired Countrywide Financial on July 1, 2008.
“Yesterday at Mt. Zion Baptist church, I heard Rev. Dr. Sam McKinney say that congress had recently bailed out Wall Street, with pennies for Main Street and nothing for your street” McKenna said. “That’s why I’m happy to announce real relief for thousands of local homeowners on the brink of foreclosure—and for some who have already lost their homes.”
In the state of Washington, 42 percent of Countrywide’s subprime hybrid arms, 11 percent of pay option arms, and 24 percent of largely fixed-rate subprime loans are delinquent.
Under the agreement, eligible borrowers will be able to modify the terms of their loans to make monthly payments more affordable. Modified loan terms will vary according to the circumstances of the borrower, but they may include an automatic freeze or reduction in interest rates, conversion to fixed-term loans, and refinancing or reduction of principal owed.
First-year payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance (PITI) will be targeted under the modifications to equate to 34 percent of the borrower’s income (or 25 percent of income for borrowers for whom taxes and insurance are not escrowed).
Countrywide customers who want more information should call toll-free: 1-800-669-6607. Soon there also will be information at www.countrywide.com.
The settlement resolves allegations that Countrywide had used unfair and deceptive tactics in its loan-origination and servicing activities – and that borrowers often were put in structurally unfair and unaffordable loans. Countrywide is the largest provider of sub-prime mortgages in the U.S.
Bank of America / Countrywide also will pay $150 million to states nationwide in a Foreclosure Relief Program for eligible Countrywide customers who suffered foreclosure or who have made only minimal payments since their mortgages were originated. The states may use up to half of those funds for programs aimed at preventing foreclosures. Bank of America / Countrywide also will pay up to $70 million nationwide in payments for relocation assistance to borrowers unable to retain their homes, and will waive up to $60-$80 million in prepayment penalties and default fees.
“Today’s agreement will help eligible Washingtonians keep their homes,” McKenna said. “As we’ve seen in the recent financial downturn, home foreclosures have a big impact on the economic health of our country and our state. Helping Washingtonians pay their mortgages and stay in their homes is the right thing to do for our citizens and for our economy.”
More details at link. http://atg.wa.gov/pressrelease.aspx?id=21054
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 07, 2008, 01:29:03 AM by Poco »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poco
|
 |
« Reply #730 on: October 07, 2008, 11:52:07 PM » |
|
Now we know what that sound was in Suzanne Vega's song, Cracking:The Crack of Doomhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/3148364/Russia-and-Brazil-crumble-as-commodity-prices-crash.htmlRussia and Brazil crumble as commodity prices crashThe entire complex of commodities and emerging market stocks, bonds, and currencies is now in free-fall as the economic crisis spreads like brushfire, threatening to draw every corner of the globe into the vortex of recession. By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard Last Updated: 1:51PM BST 07 Oct 2008 "Oil, grains, and industrial metals all crumbled as the week began despite the passage of the Paulson bail-out plan in Washington and dramatic moves by European governments to shore up their banking systems, compounding the steepest commodity crash in over half a century.
The big exception yesterday was gold, which surged $34 to $864 an ounce on safe-haven buying as the markets came face to face with the unsettling reality that the euro is no healthier than the dollar, and perhaps sicker.
The euro’s dramatic slide over the past two weeks has for the first time exposed the instability of the twin-pillar system holding up global finance.
Hans Redeker, currency chief at BNP Paribas, said investors fear that no one is in charge of Europe’s monetary union. “Who is Mr Europe? What is his telephone number? There is no such thing. We have a cancer eating at the system because even healthy companies cannot roll over their debts, yet the politicians still don’t understand the risk", he said.
“The boom was fuelled by massive speculation,” said Charles Dumas, chief strategist at Lombard Street Research.
“Commodity derivatives in the spring had a face of $10 trillion, so it doesn’t take many bulls to sell and send prices crashing. Remember all those clever bankers saying this was the new investment medium, 'uncorrelated’ with either assets? Well, it’s correlated now – downwards,” he said.
The Australian dollar, the beacon of commodity sentiment, went into near-meltdown yesterday, dropping 9.7pc against the yen in the largest one-day drop on record as Japanese investors dumped their Uridashi bonds and scrambled to close bets on high-yield economies – known as the carry trade.
Brent crude oil fell to $85 a barrel, down over 40pc since the July spike. It is a casualty of the synchronised recession engulfing the entire G7 bloc of leading powers.
Japan and the eurozone are already contracting: the Anglo-Saxon economies are close behind. The new twist is an abrupt downturn in China, until now the dominant force in the oil and metals boom.
Albert Edwards, global strategist at Société Generale, said China depends on exports to US and Europe for its lifeblood, and could face banking problems of its own.
“I think China is going into recession as well. This is going to catch investors off-guard.”
Stephen Jen, currency chief at Morgan Stanley, said the “glowing reputation” enjoyed by emerging markets during the global boom was a deception caused by the easy-money largesse of the credit bubble. Strip that away, and the picture looks very different.
“They are very vulnerable to a U-turn in capital flows,” he said.
The oil slide has reached the point where it is setting off a powerful chain reaction through the nexus of global markets. It may soon be unprofitable to divert much of the US crop harvest to biofuels, so futures contracts are rapidly scaling back assumptions. Corn fell 6.4pc yesterday, while soya beans were off 5.4pc.
(Food may actually get more affordable when we stop burning it.)
There are fears that Russia could slip into a downward spiral if oil drops to $50 a barrel, which is now the lower end of Merrill Lynch’s forecast.
Veteran analysts say they have seen this movie before. " Sure, we have seen a commodity crash before, but not one on financial steroids like this one is.
My sympathies for those who set this up and profited from it and expect U.S. taxpayers to foot the bill.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vInuw2f5xn0&feature=related
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 08, 2008, 01:51:51 AM by Poco »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poco
|
 |
« Reply #731 on: October 11, 2008, 03:35:55 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
trudy1
|
 |
« Reply #732 on: October 11, 2008, 04:17:31 PM » |
|
Poco, You did a great job with the music and the pictures.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
trudy1
|
 |
« Reply #733 on: October 11, 2008, 04:24:23 PM » |
|
More tent cities. you have the whole article. One guy even has his dog with him. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26776283/ 4:36 p.m. ET, Thurs., Sept. 18, 2008 RENO, Nev. - A few tents cropped up hard by the railroad tracks, pitched by men left with nowhere to go once the emergency winter shelter closed for the summer. Then others appeared — people who had lost their jobs to the ailing economy, or newcomers who had moved to Reno for work and discovered no one was hiring. Within weeks, more than 150 people were living in tents big and small, barely a foot apart in a patch of dirt slated to be a parking lot for a campus of shelters Reno is building for its homeless population. Like many other cities, Reno has found itself with a "tent city" — an encampment of people who had nowhere else to go.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tesla
|
 |
« Reply #734 on: October 11, 2008, 04:25:50 PM » |
|
Poco, you have such a gift in putting together pictures, words, poetry and music. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|