|
|
|
Sandi K
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2008, 02:01:45 PM » |
|
WTF? Pardon me, but this is infuriating, Im already cranky coz Waskly Wabbit hasnt been to visit today and Im owrried about him. So, to date, am I correct that not a thing has been done on the FDAAA amendment to make pet food safer? Nada? Not even the early warning system? I think I'll hurl my lunch over this. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
3catkidneyfailure
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2008, 02:04:50 PM » |
|
It's only half a bone, Sandi, but I know I'll use it in my consumer purchasing decisions, and for that I have to thank USDA. For not making pet food safer or even making a token showing, I know who to thank.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kaffe
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2008, 02:12:27 PM » |
|
Thant's what it sounds like to me, Sandi! When a food is processed - as what we have with petfood - country of origin of the individual ingredients do not need to be divulged. So, we are back to square one depending on the PF manufacturer to disclose to us where they get their individual ingredients! hrummmppp!  And befor home-cookers say "yippee" - it looks like we can know country of origin of some cuts of meat - but what about our important supplements? This is what we homecookers truly lose sleep on!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sandi K
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2008, 02:14:21 PM » |
|
I mean I am glad that some things are covered, its better than nothing but I dont see anything being done for pet food at all. I wonder where Mike Floyd is, he was about the only voice we had..... OK, now Im depressed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
3catkidneyfailure
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2008, 02:20:48 PM » |
|
I think maybe Mike got depressed, too, or silenced.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sandi K
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: August 04, 2008, 02:24:57 PM » |
|
I'd feel better if we all joined together for a lunch-hurling in honor of PFI.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
3catkidneyfailure
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: August 04, 2008, 02:36:00 PM » |
|
And here I thought I was left to hurl cranky criticisms on the internet thingy in no uncertain terms at the responsible parties. Join in hurling lunch, Sandi. May all the PFI pet food luncheons be adulterated in the same fashion as the pet food and too much of the human food. But perhaps a little less of what comes into my house because of some labels. Also have to make a pact to report every unlabeled piece of meat, veggie, or fruit to the USDA hotline if this interim ruling survives to become law.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 04, 2008, 02:44:18 PM by 3catkidneyfailure »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Carol
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: August 04, 2008, 02:42:16 PM » |
|
Well I am hurling dinner (time difference) and too angry to write anything else right now....  what a joke.... 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.” — Margaret Mead
United we stand Divided we fall....
|
|
|
|
YesBiscuit!
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: August 04, 2008, 03:00:27 PM » |
|
Well anyone, including pet food companies, can still CHOOSE to put COOL on their labels, even if they aren't required by law to do so. I'd like to see it mandated across the board myself but since we don't have that, I'm still looking for individual companies willing to do the right thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
3catkidneyfailure
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: August 04, 2008, 03:07:23 PM » |
|
The rule outlines the requirements for labeling covered commodities. It reduces the recordkeeping retention requirements for suppliers and centrally-located retail records to one year and removes the requirement to maintain records at the retail store. The law provides for penalties for both suppliers and retailers found in violation of the law of up to $1,000 per violation.
The rule will become effective on Sept. 30, 2008. To allow time for covered commodities that are already in the chain of commerce -- and for which no origin information is known or been provided -- to clear the system, the requirements of this rule will not apply to covered commodities produced or packaged before Sept. 30, 2008Copies of the interim final rule: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateM&navID=CountryofOriginLabeling&rightNav1=CountryofOriginLabeling&topNav=&leftNav=CommodityAreas&page=CountryOfOriginLabeling&acct=cntryoforgnlblhttp://www.fsis.usda.gov/FSIS_Recalls/Problems_With_Food_Products/index.aspWhat can you do? For Help With Meat, Poultry And Egg Products: Call the toll-free USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline at 1-888-MPHotline (1-888-674-6854).
For Help With Non-Meat Food Products (Cereals, Fish, Produce, Fruit Juice, Pastas, Cheeses, etc): For complaints about food products which do not contain meat or poultry -- such as cereal -- call or write to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Check your local phone book under U.S. Government, Health and Human Services, to find an FDA office in your area. The FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition can be reached at 1-888-723-3366.
See FDA Emergency Reporting Numbers, state by state, at: http://itchmoforums.com/news-recall-related/pet-food-problems-fda-emergency-report-number-november-2007-t2629.0.html
In order for the USDA to investigate a problem with meat, poultry or egg products, you must have:
The original container or packaging Any foreign object that you might have discovered in the product Any uneaten portion of the food (refrigerate or freeze it)
Information you should be ready to tell the Hotline on the phone includes: Name, address and phone number; Brand name, product name and manufacturer of the product The size and package type Can or package codes (not UPC bar codes) and dates Establishment number (EST) usually found in the circle or shield near the "USDA passed and inspected" phrase; Name and location of the store, as well as the date that you purchased the product. You can complain to the store or the product's manufacturer if you don't choose to make a formal complaint to the USDA. This is something consumers can sink their teeth into beginning October 1, 2008. Be sure and tell the retail manager you're going to file a complaint with the USDA/FDA. If the feds don't think it's important, the consumers have to let them know we want the other processed foods part of the bone.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 04, 2008, 03:28:56 PM by 3catkidneyfailure »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JJ
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: August 05, 2008, 12:43:50 AM » |
|
3cat always loopholes to let someone get around doing the right thing. Well that will mean people will need to refuse to buy the product/foodstuff unless its labeled whether its mixed with another vegetable/fruit or nut meat. The companies that want your trust in their product will step up and label theirs and not need more laws to make sure they do the right thing.
Still a sad thing for the pet food. But we will always be thankful to have this forum to find out information and share it immediately with others so their pets remain safe as possible. We've stuck together so far so need to keep on going to keep ahead of the curve.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'Life isn't about how to survive the storm, But how to dance in the rain.'
|
|
|
|
3catkidneyfailure
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: August 08, 2008, 11:17:04 AM » |
|
http://www.packagingdigest.com/articleXml/LN833202604.htmlCountry of Origin Rule for Foods Draws Criticism From Hill By Aliya Sternstein, CQ Staff -- Congressional Quarterly Today, August 6, 2008 Wednesday A proposed rule for country of origin labeling is meeting resistance from food safety advocates in Congress as the Sept. 30 deadline for implementation approaches. The Agriculture Department's interim final rule, issued July 28, does not meet the requirements in the 2008 farm law, said one of the House's primary food safety watchdogs, Agriculture Appropriations Chairman Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JJ
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: August 10, 2008, 06:24:03 AM » |
|
3cat got a Page Not Found when clicking your new link??
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'Life isn't about how to survive the storm, But how to dance in the rain.'
|
|
|
|