|
menusux
|
 |
« on: April 18, 2009, 09:28:44 AM » |
|
http://www.kansascity.com/657/story/1146954.htmlKansas City.com April 18, 2009 EPA executes warrant at dog treat plant "The Environmental Protection Agency and other agencies executed a federal search warrant Thursday at one of the nation's largest suppliers of natural dog treats.
"EPA spokesman Rich Hood said the agency is investigating environmental and other alleged federal crimes at Wichita-based TreatCo, 2300 N. Broadway."Thursday's operation involved about a dozen people from the EPA's criminal investigative division and EPA technical experts along with agents from the state Health Department and Wichita police. "Officials with the city of Wichita who were involved with the search referred calls to the EPA. "Attempts to reach Hood for further comment after the search were unsuccessful. "TreatCo's receptionist told the Associated Press she was too busy and could not refer a call to anyone else for comment. "A woman who answered The Eagle's phone call later Thursday said: "It's just a witch hunt. That's all I've got to say." "According to the EPA's Web site, TreatCo has been in significant noncompliance with the handling of hazardous waste since Dec. 7, 2006.
"Significant noncompliance is EPA's most serious level of violation. The company has not been fined by the EPA.
"The company's Web site says TreatCo processes more than 2 million pounds of product monthly. It buys beef byproducts from Kansas and Texas slaughterhouses to make dog treats."Attempts to reach Ken Thomas, who is vice president and plant manager of TreatCo, were unsuccessful." http://www.kansascity.com/news/breaking_news/story/1148652.htmlKansas City.com April 18, 2009 EPA mostly mum on TreatCo case "Officials with the Environmental Protection Agency on Friday revealed little about their search and collection of evidence at TreatCo, one of the nation's largest suppliers of natural dog treats.
"Thursday's operation at the TreatCo plant, 2300 N. Broadway, involved the EPA's criminal investigative division and EPA technical experts, along with agents from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Wichita police and numerous city officials and employees.""It's too early on to determine whether we can confirm whether there were actually violations," said Michael Burnett, special agent in charge for the EPA's criminal investigation division. ""We had a lot of people there. We were doing all of our evidence gathering." ""EPA spokesman Rich Hood said, "This investigation has nothing to do with the product that is produced in the plant."
"He would not provide further details.
"TreatCo officials declined to comment. Employees of businesses near the plant said it appeared that employees who showed up to work there Friday morning were sent home."So we need to know which PFC's have TreatCo as their co-packer.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 18, 2009, 10:04:25 AM by menusux »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bug
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2009, 09:40:46 AM » |
|
Well, yes, even if it has nothing to do with the product itself, do we really want to be doing business with a company that is not handing their waste or whatever in an environmentally responsible manner?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Red and Bones, my baby boys, you'll always be in my heart. Mom will see you later. Look after each other, ok?
|
|
|
|
menusux
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2009, 09:49:33 AM » |
|
Here's info from the TreatCo website: http://www.treatco.com/TreatCo Premium Biscuits http://www.treatco.com/main.htm"TreatCo. uses only USDA approved materials as the baseline for our product selection. To make our product even better, all operations, including preparation and cooking are done inside an air-conditioned facility. This allows us to maintain better control over infestation and bacteria growth.
"NOTICE: TreatCo. only purchases beef from Kansas and Texas packing plants, which have had a "no-downer" slaughter policy in place since 2000. Please know that you are buying the safest and highest quality products for your customer's pet."http://www.treatco.com/catalog.pdfTheir full line catalog. http://www.treatco.com/indexb.htmBeef treats http://www.treatco.com/indexp.htmPork treats http://www.treatco.com/indexl.htmLamb treats http://www.treatco.com/indexr.htmPoppers, Moovers n' Beggars, Lamb Choppies, Beggars n' Chewsers, Chicken Filet, Biscotti with Chondroitin and Glucosamine, Soft and Chewies, Puppy Snaps, Beef Knackers, Fun Bully Six Treats, Natural Bones and Cow Hooves willed with Beef, Cheese, Peanut Butter or Pizza Mix, Premium Biscuits--Savory Steak, Peanut Butter, Lamb & Rice, Turkey & Potato. http://www.treatco.com/index4.htmThe largest USDA - A.P.H.I.S. natural treat manufacturing plant in the United States - 750,000-sq. ft. with freezers and refrigeration. Indisputably offers the best overall price, quality and service of any natural treat company in the United States. TreatCo processes over 2 million pounds of product per month, and is still growing. Products used only from USDA approved packing plants. Experts at custom packaging, private label or co-packing. Just-in-time programs for large use customers. So on paper or online, this all looks so good--what's happening there with the hazardous waste which EPA says is of long-standing? If you check out the website and download the pdf catalog, you might be able to see something similar that is co-packed by them. Guess we need to ask a lot of questions once again about the treats! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pita_Purr_Parler
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2009, 09:52:23 AM » |
|
It has to be the waste water for it to be the EPA, IMO. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/tris_control.tris_print?tris_id=64836RCNCRROUTEAMMONIA (TRI Chemical ID: 007664417) 2007 Pounds: 53803 TREATCO INC. 2300 N BROADWAY WICHITA, KS 67219 Wastewater Treatment (Excluding POTW) This is the amount in 2002, and you can see it is exponentially increasing: AMMONIA (TRI Chemical ID: 007664417) 2002 Pounds: 3028 TREATCO INC. 2300 N BROADWAY WICHITA, KS 67219 Wastewater Treatment (Excluding POTW)
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 18, 2009, 09:57:22 AM by Offy »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Carol
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2009, 04:22:39 AM » |
|
Private label/C0-packer-------wonder how many others they manufacture for...kind of like the "Menu Foods" of treats maybe? But even though it says the product is not affected I too think how the plant is run in total is a reflection of the company so that statement does nothing to make me feel more at ease...Interesting to see if we hear more on this..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.” — Margaret Mead
United we stand Divided we fall....
|
|
|
|
Pita_Purr_Parler
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2009, 06:44:14 AM » |
|
Back in 1999-2000, Sergeant's had a dog treat recall for Salmonella - manufactured by Treatco. I saw they make peanut butter treats & wondered why they've not had any recent recalls...... PRODUCT Dog treats containing beef trachea: a) Uncle Sam's Chew-N-Moo, 2 pieces/retail package (UPC #0-73091-81618-8), 12/2-piece packages/case (Item #81618, UPC #100-73091-81618-5). b) Uncle Sam's Value Pack Steer-N-Chew, 7 pieces/retail package (UPC #0-73091-81623-2), 12/7-piece packages per case (Item #81623, UPC #100-73091-81623-9). c) Uncle Sam's Steer-N-Chew Value Pack Holiday Gift, 7 pieces/retail package (UPC #0-73091-81623-2), 12/7-piece packages/case (Item #81623, UPC #100-73091-81623-). d) Uncle Sam's Value Pack Steer-N-Hog Chew, 8 pieces/retail package, UPC #0-73091-81624-9), 12/8-piece packages/case (Item #81624, UPC #100-73091-81624-6). e) Uncle Sam's Steer-N-Hog Chew Value Pack Holiday Gift, 8 pieces/retail package (UPC #0-73091-81624-9), 12/8-piece packages/case (Item #81624, UPC #100-73091-81624-6). f) Old West Beef Trachea packaged in 60-ct. hex jars, Item #81918. (This product is sold in retail stores by the piece and the jar is displayed with 7 other varieties of dog treats in separate jars). Recall #V-070/075-0. CODE None. All products produced since June 1, 1999. MANUFACTURER Treatco, Inc., Wichita, Kansas. RECALLED BY Sergeant's Pet Products, Inc., Omaha, Nebraska, by letter dated December 28, 1999, and by press release on December 29, 1999. Firm-initiated recall ongoing. DISTRIBUTION Nationwide and Canada. QUANTITY 1,461 cases were distributed. REASON Products may be contaminated with Salmonella.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
3catkidneyfailure
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: April 19, 2009, 09:14:07 AM » |
|
This certainly appears really, really ugly. The EPA wouldn't be issuing warrants in conjunction with State authorities if the manufacturer hadn't refused to cooperate. Great work, menusux and Offy, and definitely bears watching.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JJ
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2009, 12:06:25 AM » |
|
Offy good find and also raised the question of why no recalls on the peanut butter stuff. Mensux as always keeping us up to date on what other things go on with these companies.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
May your troubles be less, Your blessings be more, And nothing but happiness Come through your door
|
|
|
ToGoodToBeTrue
Newbie

Posts: 1
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2009, 01:03:38 PM » |
|
In regards to allegation by Pita_Purr_Parter about Back in 1999-2000, Sergeant's had a treat recall for Salmonella in which TreatCo was alleged to of be the manufacture. TreatCo's product was sold in bulk for repackaging through a third party. Then the third party mixed rather known as co-mingled TreatCo’s product with theirs & other's. Once the product leaves TreatCo; we have no quality control over how the product is kept till package or after the product is packaged & kept. There is NO proof and only allegations’ that it was TreatCo’s product. During this Salmonella scared & recall by Sergeants’, TreatCo Facility was inspected by the FDA! FDA did not find Salmonella in our facility nor in our products! FDA concluded that the allegations were FALSE concerning TreatCo! TreatCo has never had to do a RECALL & we pray that we never will!
We are very selective with whom, where & how; we purchase our raw ingredients for our products’ that we produce! We do extensive research to make sure we can produce a quality product, first & foremost down to the purchase of raw materials from suppliers….
As shown is the recent Peanut Butter scare…… TreatCo choose to use extruded peanuts from Texas in our products. For the simple reason is that extruded are sterilized at 320 F and 10,000 lbs of pressure thus reducing the chances of contamination.
TreatCo is always looking for ways of improving our role in the community and our World. And one thing is finding ways to go GREEN! TreatCo has gone GREEN with our boxes that we package our products in for shipping and in other materials we use in our facility.
We take the safety issues very seriously and strongly believe in
"Only The Best For Your Best Friend!" [/color][/color][/color]
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
menusux
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2009, 02:30:54 PM » |
|
You say "we"--are you an employee of this company?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
menusux
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2009, 04:04:57 PM » |
|
In regards to allegation by Pita_Purr_Parter about Back in 1999-2000, Sergeant's had a treat recall for Salmonella in which TreatCo was alleged to of be the manufacture. TreatCo's product was sold in bulk for repackaging through a third party. Then the third party mixed rather known as co-mingled TreatCo’s product with theirs & other's. Once the product leaves TreatCo; we have no quality control over how the product is kept till package or after the product is packaged & kept. There is NO proof and only allegations’ that it was TreatCo’s product. During this Salmonella scared & recall by Sergeants’, TreatCo Facility was inspected by the FDA! FDA did not find Salmonella in our facility nor in our products! FDA concluded that the allegations were FALSE concerning TreatCo!.[/center][/color][/color][/color]
And now a question for you because you are also making allegations that another company was the source of the salmonella contamination and recall.
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ENFORCE/ENF00636.html
PRODUCT Dog treats containing beef trachea: a) Uncle Sam's Chew-N-Moo, 2 pieces/retail package (UPC #0-73091-81618-8), 12/2-piece packages/case (Item #81618, UPC #100-73091-81618-5). b) Uncle Sam's Value Pack Steer-N-Chew, 7 pieces/retail package (UPC #0-73091-81623-2), 12/7-piece packages per case (Item #81623, UPC #100-73091-81623-9). c) Uncle Sam's Steer-N-Chew Value Pack Holiday Gift, 7 pieces/retail package (UPC #0-73091-81623-2), 12/7-piece packages/case (Item #81623, UPC #100-73091-81623-). d) Uncle Sam's Value Pack Steer-N-Hog Chew, 8 pieces/retail package, UPC #0-73091-81624-9), 12/8-piece packages/case (Item #81624, UPC #100-73091-81624-6). e) Uncle Sam's Steer-N-Hog Chew Value Pack Holiday Gift, 8 pieces/retail package (UPC #0-73091-81624-9), 12/8-piece packages/case (Item #81624, UPC #100-73091-81624-6). f) Old West Beef Trachea packaged in 60-ct. hex jars, Item #81918. (This product is sold in retail stores by the piece and the jar is displayed with 7 other varieties of dog treats in separate jars). Recall #V-070/075-0. CODE None. All products produced since June 1, 1999. MANUFACTURER Treatco, Inc., Wichita, Kansas. RECALLED BY Sergeant's Pet Products, Inc., Omaha, Nebraska, by letter dated December 28, 1999, and by press release on December 29, 1999. Firm-initiated recall ongoing. DISTRIBUTION Nationwide and Canada. QUANTITY 1,461 cases were distributed. REASON Products may be contaminated with Salmonella.
This is the only FDA record of the matter--showing one company recalling and another as the manufacturer of them.
What proof can you provide regarding this being the fault of the company you named? What proof can you provide regarding the mentioned FDA inspection in 1999?
No one can say that it's one company's fault over another's without some proof being provided other than the words in your post. When you name names, prove it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cato
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2009, 05:35:45 PM » |
|
Welcome to Itchmo, ToGoodToBeTRue. Are you a representative of TreatCo? The reason I am asking is that several heads or representatives of other petfood companies have come here to discuss issues concerning their particular food at those times when there was an issue. They came and answered questions from the members and visitors of this forum. Will you take questions too?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 28, 2009, 05:42:32 PM by Cato »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
3catkidneyfailure
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: April 28, 2009, 05:40:14 PM » |
|
Manufacturers of pet products who feel they have been treated unfairly by the FDA are certainly welcome to post here their views. Consumers of FDA regulated foods sometimes have the same feeling regarding treatment by the FDA. But I join menusux in requesting that if you make blanket statements that TreatCo was not the source of the Salmonella contamination or was inspected for Salmonella contamination by the FDA during the relevant time period that you also include documentation that would back up such a statement. It would be greatly appreciated and lend credibility to your statements and point of view.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Beyond Pissed
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: June 29, 2009, 04:00:26 AM » |
|
Are there any updates as to what happened here? (Records sealed?) April 30: http://pets.kansascity.com/article/5225&pt=Kan.-dog-treat-maker-responds-to-investigations"In its first public comments since its Wichita plant was searched by investigators earlier this month, TreatCo defended itself but did not specifically address allegations of environmental violations and other federal crimes." (snip)
"In the consent order, the city contended TreatCo was receiving waste petroleum oil generated off site. It noted odors created at the plant and contended Treatco failed to notify it that it was taking in process waste from companies in Great Bend, Galena and Arkansas City and discharging that waste into the city sewer system.
KDHE documents also showed several citations, warning letters, consent agreements or orders relating to environmental violations in 1999 and from 2002 to 2006.
Traster said there are fewer environmental issues at TreatCo now because his client is less interested in projects that in the past have created difficulties with government agencies."
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 29, 2009, 04:10:56 AM by 5Pitas »
|
Logged
|
"If the pet food does not perform in the consumer's hands, then all of the advertising on earth will not be persuasive." Dr. R. Glenn Brown. Canadian Veterinary Journal, Volume 35, in April of 1994
|
|
|
|
menusux
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: June 29, 2009, 07:49:31 AM » |
|
Here's local news with a rundown of what went on there: http://www.kwch.com/global/story.asp?s=10197371KWCH-TV April 16, 2009 Original Coverage "The Environmental Protection Agency is investigating a Wichita plant that makes dog treats. Federal agents served a search warrant Thursday morning at TreatCo. According to the plant's website, it uses by-products from slaughter houses to make dog treats. It processes over 2 million pounds of products per month. EPA officials say its investigation does not concern the dog treats themselves - only possible environmental violations by the company. http://www.epa-echo.gov/cgi-bin/get1cReport.cgi?tool=echo&IDNumber=110017481553"Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) Report on TreatCo at link. KDHE and the City of Wichita are helping with the investigation. On Thursday, investigators appeared to take samples and inspect the property. EPA officials would not say what they were looking for. "The agency's criminal division is in charge of the investigation. This unit of the EPA often deals with the most serious environmental violations as well as companies which intentionally, willfully or knowingly break the law. "The plant is operated by Ken Thomas, who recently ran for Wichita City Council. He was defeated in the primary. "According to The Associated Press, EPA spokesman Rich Hood said Thursday's operation involved about a dozen people from the EPA's criminal investigative division and EPA technical experts along with agents from the state Health Department and Wichita police. "We do know that no arrests have been made and the investigation is ongoing."
Update 4/17/09 "Eyewitness News has learned this isn't the first time TreatCo has been in trouble with the EPA. Compliance records show the company didn't meet standards in 2006 and 2008. Specifically, the EPA alleged TreatCo violated the Clean Air Act and mismanaged hazardous waste. The company uses slaughter house meat products to make dog treats but EPA officials say animal by-products are not considered hazardous waste. That classification includes chemicals that could do serious harm to humans and the environment. "The north branch of the Chisholm Creek runs near the plant. A former Wichita official tells us the city had problems with TreatCo because it wouldn't allow workers on its property to inspect the creek. At this time, the EPA won't say whether the creek has anything to do with the investigation. "TreatCo is not the only company located inside the 750,000 square foot building. It also houses a bio-diesel plant, a worm farm and a Spanish language newspaper. "Neighbors says there's a lot of truck traffic in and out of the plant every day. They wonder if it's related to what the EPA is investigating."
Update 4/23/09 "New information about what may have led to a federal investigation at a Wichita dog treat plant. Federal agents served a search warrant at TreatCo one week ago. The Environmental Protection Agency is investigating whether the plant violated environmental laws. "Eyewitness News obtained compliance and licensing records from the City of Wichita and its dealings with TreatCo. According to the reports, the city has issued TreatCo 30 separate violations dating back to 2001. The majority of the violations are for breaking the Clean Water Act. "Besides making dog snacks, TreatCo had a city permit to be a centralized waste treatment facility for other companies. A pipeline connects the plant to the city's sewer system. But over the years, the city discovered TreatCo was processing wastewater for additional companies and putting it into the sewer. "In 2007, testing found abnormal "floating solids" and a "bright yellow substance" at a Wichita sewage treatment plant. Officials traced it back to TreatCo. "City documents also show TreatCo owner Margie Thomas and plant manager Ken Thomas refused to allow city inspectors into the facility at least twice. "In 2007, after years of violations and reports, TreatCo and the city reached a consent agreement. TreatCo signed it yet still disputed the allegations. The agreement states the company decided to enter into the agreement to save the time and cost of litigating the matter in court. The agreement says TreatCo will pay nearly $13,000 in fines and will stop processing any outside wastewater. In other words, the only substance it could send to the city's sewer plant is what is left from making dog treats. "On the day the EPA warrant was served, Eyewitness News noticed a truck from a Clay Center, Kansas, company pulling into TreatCo. When we contacted that company, the owner said federal investigators told him not to comment. The EPA says this remains an open investigation. Details of the investigation have been filed in federal court but remain under seal at this time."
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|