Itchmo Forums for Cats & Dogs Brought to you by Itchmo: Essential news, humor and info for cats, dogs and pet owners.
August 28, 2008, 03:35:33 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Go To Itchmo.com: Read the latest cat, dog and pet news, pet food recall info, product reviews and more — updated daily.


Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]
  Print  
Author Topic: Tainted pet food suit settled for $24 million  (Read 1854 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Carol
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1562


Harry with the "Golden Bone" 6/29/05--4/24/08


View Profile
« Reply #75 on: July 01, 2008, 07:48:29 AM »

http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2008/06/local_pet_owners_to_get_compen.html

"The exact number of pets affected by contaminated food last year is not known, but Sherrie Savett, a lawyer for pet owners, estimated that 1,500 animals died and several times that number were sickened with severe kidney and urinary disorders."


I did not like seeing that number coming from one of the attorneys in the suit and I think she is one of the lawyers involved in this lawsuit as I gogled her name and this link came up---it is from Sept and my not too smart legaleeze thinks that there was some infighting among the attorney back then....but maybe that is not what this shows...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2731058/IN-RE-PET-FOOD-PRODUCTS-LIABILITY-LITIGATION-Document-No-52


I am still trying to figure out what we should do with our claim forms.... Huh  ...alot of conflict....I truly wanted a jury trial with everybody under oath---as everything I have ever said or wrote is as if I am "under oath"...
Logged

“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.” — Margaret Mead

United we stand     Divided we fall....
3catkidneyfailure
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1812


All the fur-kids count


View Profile
« Reply #76 on: July 01, 2008, 08:46:47 AM »

http://www.classactionlitigation.com/proceedings.html
How a Class Action Proceeds in Court

Very few class actions ever get to trial, but answers to interrogatories are under oath or penalty of perjury, Carol.

This relates directly to the New Jersey consolidated cases pet food settlement:

http://www.petfoodsettlement.com/faqs/#idQ2

What if I do not want to be a part of the settlement?   (top)
If you don't want to be bound by or receive a payment from this Settlement, or you want the right to pursue your claims individually in court, then you must take steps to get out of the Settlement Class. This is called excluding yourself from or is sometimes referred to as "opting out" of the Settlement Class.

If you choose to opt out of the Settlement and the Settlement Class you will not receive any payment under the Settlement.

To exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you must send a signed statement to that effect that includes your name, address and telephone number. The statement must be sent to the following:
Claims Administrator
Pet Food Settlement
c/o Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP.
P.O. Box 890
Philadelphia, PA 19105-0890
You must mail your request for exclusion postmarked by August 15, 2008 to:

You cannot exclude yourself on the phone, by email, or at the website
.

Any member of the Settlement Class who opts out of the Settlement can change their mind and rejoin the Settlement Class. To do so, you must deliver to Class Counsel and the Claims Administrator a written revocation to your request to opt out within seven (7) days before the Final Approval Hearing.
When is the final approval hearing?   (top)
The Court has scheduled a final Settlement Approval Hearing for October 14, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.


If as a class member, you want to object to the settlement terms, for example, the provision under which the defendants admit no wrong doing, and enough class members file objections, the settlement would have to be renegotiated; or perhaps by filing a written objection, you could at least state your opinion that the settlement is unjust:
Can I comment on, or object to, the proposed settlement?   (top)
If you want to remain a class member, but have comments about, or disagree with any aspect of the proposed Settlement, you must file a written objection in the case with the Clerk of Court and send a copy to Class Counsel postmarked by September 12, 2008. Your document must clearly state that it relates to Civil Action Number: 07-2867 (NLH), MDL No. 1850, and include your full name address, telephone number, your signature, and a brief explanation of your comment or reason for objection. Please see the "Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Final Fairness Hearing" for further instructions of how to file a written objection.

If you fall within the class definition and do not want to be prevented from bringing, continuing, or being a part of such a lawsuit, you must exclude yourself from the Settlement Class and proposed Settlement as explained in FAQ 13.



What is this lawsuit about?   (top)
There is a proposed Settlement of class action lawsuits known as In Re: Pet Food Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1850, Civil Action No. 07-2867 (NLH) (All Cases) that are pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey and similar lawsuits pending in Canada. This proposed Settlement Agreement is with various companies and persons or entities that handled, distributed, purchased for resale and/or redistribution, supplied, manufactured and/or sold or offered for sale pet food and/or pet treats that may have contained contaminated wheat gluten or rice protein concentrate and were recalled beginning in March 2007, as well as certain companies, persons or entities that supplied that wheat gluten or rice protein concentrate ("Recalled Pet Food Products"). The lawsuits alleged that some of the Recalled Pet Food Products in some cases may have led to illness or death from conditions known as acute kidney or renal failure. The symptoms of these conditions included vomiting, tiredness, decreased appetite, increased urination, and/or increased drinking or water intake by the affected pet.

By agreeing to the proposed Settlement described in this Notice, the defendants make no admission as to the truth of these allegations, and they deny any wrongdoing.
Who can participate in this litigation?   (top)
The Class includes all pet owners in the United States or Canada who purchased, used or obtained or whose pets consumed the Recalled Pet Food Products, unless you are a member of the class certified by the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai'i in Lum v. Menu Foods, Inc., et al. (Civil No. 07-1-0849-05 (EEH)). If you have questions regarding whether you are a member of the Lum class, you may contact the Claims Administrator. The contact information for the Claims Administrator is at the end of this Notice.

« Last Edit: July 01, 2008, 09:02:20 AM by 3catkidneyfailure » Logged
Don Earl
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 475


Chuckles - Killed by Menu Foods


View Profile WWW
« Reply #77 on: July 01, 2008, 11:28:50 AM »

I'll toss in my two cents worth on the opt out issue. While I think it goes without saying that I'd like to see these guys pinned to the floor until they yell "Uncle", that isn't within the means of a lot of those affected. Opting out means getting nothing unless an affected pet owner has firm plans for an alternative form of action. If that isn't the case, my view is more would likely be accomplished by working within the system and going on record to file objections. Objections may be made on any point, including the part where everyone affected is being asked to buy a pig in a poke on opting out.

IMO, the last is the most ludicrous aspect of these terms. Affected pet owners are being told they have to accept or reject the deal before a final decision has been entered as to exactly what the deal is that they are accepting or rejecting. That's absurd!

Not to put too find a point on it, and meaning no offense to anyone on a personal level, it's time to fish or cut bait. If an affected pet owner isn't willing to step up to the plate, and put their name on the dotted line, they have no cause for complaint later on.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Copyright 2007 Itchmo.com: Read the latest cat, dog and pet news, pet food recall info, product reviews and more — updated daily.
Powered by SMF 1.1.3 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
| Sitemap